VIP Magazine, Reports, Wires Weekly: support for better decision-making.
Subscribe »

Enter your
email address:

VIP Account »
FreePint Account »

FreePint Shop: My Shop


Bookmark and Share

Testimonial?
If you find VIP useful, please supply a testimonial »








Home > Wires > VIP LiveWire > Message

Tighter DIY policing of FT usage?

Share this posting:

Content feed RSS Feeds    Twitter feed Twitter Feed

... or subscribe to the free VIP Wires Weekly.

 

Scroll down  Scroll down to read the full posting

Click to visit the VIP LiveWire 

« Return to the VIP LiveWire Message Index

 


Click to visit the FreePint ShopFreePint Research Report: Information Governance Policies and Priorities: This was the first time FreePint Research brought together various areas of information governance -- records management, IP protection, copyright risk management, etc. -- into a single research project.
Find out more »

The VIP LiveWire is free
thanks to our sponsors:

Message Index    |  Flat View  

Share this posting:




Return to the
Message Index


Featured post:


Popular posts:
(60 days)


Latest posts:
(60 days)


Return to
Message Index


Testimonial? If you find VIP useful, please supply a testimonial »

 Tighter DIY policing of FT usage?
Author:Tim Buckley Owen
Date:Wednesday, 22nd Apr 2009 18:23
Views:4,368 (excluding Digests and RSS feeds)
Category:Industry Update
URL:http://www.vivavip.com/go/e18994

Presumably it was just coincidence that prompted the Financial Times to launch its new Access Manager service only a couple of months after it took legal action against one of its own customers, the US private equity firm Blackstone, for alleged multiple uses of its ft.com log-in (http://www.vivavip.com/go/e16109). Using IP authentication, the FT’s new service allows information managers to track usage of ft.com within the organisation, including the number of users signed up and their frequency of usage (details at http://web.vivavip.com/forum/Wire/read.php?i=76502).

Meanwhile, though, the Blackstone matter is now closed. ‘We have agreed to a full settlement of all issues,’ the FT has told VIP. ‘The terms of the settlement are confidential, but we are pleased to have been able to reach a settlement with Blackstone on terms that were acceptable to us.’

It wasn’t prepared to say whether the timing of Access Manager’s launch was in any way influenced by the Blackstone case – but the two events in combination certainly serve to reinforce the message that the FT is serious about policing the use of its content. One of the benefits it cites for Access Manager is the availability of usage trends data for ease of cross-charging to different departments – but it could also have the effect of putting some of the onus of ensuring legitimate usage onto the information manager.

Potential abuse of licences is certainly something that information managers need to be alert to. According to research by information security specialist SafeNet Inc, half of UK companies have no way of tracking the distribution of their software licences.

As the news portal SecurityPark comments (http://digbig.com/4yqdn), this means that companies could be putting themselves at risk of hefty fines from vendors for illegal usage. On the other hand, it continues, some businesses may be over-licensed and paying above the odds for the access they need.

Either way, information managers may judge that the situation in their own organisation merits some investigation.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Topic Author Date
• Tighter DIY policing of FT usage?
Presumably it was just coincidence that prompted the Financial Times to launch its new Access Manager service only a couple of months after it took legal action against one of its own customers, the US private equity firm Blackstone, for alleged multiple uses of its ft.com log-in (http://www.vivavip.com/go/e16109). Using ...
Tim Buckley Owen 22/04/09 18:23
  • Re: Tighter DIY policing of FT usage?
It is a double edge sword because an information manager wants to encourage use of resources that they purchase across the organization without breaking the budget. Vendors are right to protect their content but flexibility on pricing is essential. Too rigid a policy and in hard times revenue streams will ...
John Joe Harkin 30/04/09 16:49